Innovation = Bending the RUles

I am very grateful for nephews that let me drag them around the city over March Break. This spring we returned to TIFF’s #digiplayspace (one of my favourite outings of the year) and the ROM for their futurology exhibit. There was no shortage of cool, wonderful innovations but two caught my eye.

Feltro: Felt building pieces for all ages

IMG_3700My nephews would have spent the whole day here if I let them. The creator, an OCAD grad, designed these trapezoid building pieces from felt that have magnets along the equilateral triangles within them. I know I am not doing it justice but if you check out their site it will all make sense. What happens is the pieces can then become an art piece on a magnetic wall, a bowling ball, a structure or as my nephews preferred: body armour. I loved the idea of creating a building material that kids of all ages (that means big kids like myself too) could play and create with. There were no end to the possibilities and the two facilitators where great at helping those that needed a push to start and challenging others like my nephews to think of something new. Definitely a new spin on our traditional concept of building blocks.

Pillo: Changing the rules of gaming

IMG_3753Often when I mention games to educators or parents they think isolated kids staring at screens with controllers or iPads in their hands never looking up. They ask themselves if they will ever know how to interact with others? Will they have huge thumbs?

It is one of the reasons I was so drawn to Pillo at digiplayspace. The object of the game: reach the highlighted circles by squeezing your pillow. The catch: one player controls left to right, the other up and down which meant you had to communicate and collaborate to win the game.

Both innovations left me with questions and implications for education. 

Sitting in these beds of innovation, with cool gadgets and creations everywhere, I was reflecting on why Feltro and Pillo stood out to me. I think at it’s core I could see how both innovations played with the original definition of the category. It wasn’t just tech for techs sake. It wasn’t creating another version of the same thing. They both redefined my definition and preconceived idea of what a building material or video game could be.

We hear a lot about innovation in education: the need for it, individuals who succeed at it, the lack of it at times. Sometimes I wonder if we equate innovation with breaking the rules. Feltro and Pillo reminded me that perhaps innovation is more bending the rules. We often celebrate those who stand out and break the rules because they are taking risks. Definitely not easy but probably still the easier path. Bending the rules is much harder; taking what you know are rules and transforming them into something new. It has constraints. It challenges beliefs. It requires acceptance from the community and accepting where you are at the moment.

You may say “What’s the big deal: Break the rules, bend the rules, just change.” I feel often in education we equate innovation with the newest toy, the cool tool at the time or company of choice. That gives us excuses of why we can’t innovate. I don’t have this, I need that, you don’t give me this. Bending the rules requires nothing but creativity. We don’t have to wait for permission. Just like Feltro and PIllo it can start with our current definition and evolve as we innovate. Curriculum, structures, beliefs don’t become walls, just hurdles we use in our journey.

2 Replies to “Innovation = Bending the RUles”

  1. This definitely resonates with me. We have these traditions, structures, rules, expectations, etc, in place and we’ve been really successful at “doing school” for so long that stepping outside the norm is a risk. How do we “teach” when we allow all students to follow their own path? How do we “assess” if we’re not dictating which specific expectations students are to be practicing on a particular day? We’ve been so ingrained with backwards design, testing, etc. – all good, solid practices that have worked – that it can be hard to step away from them to something that might be better but is, as yet, unproven.

    At the same time, we’re bombarded by the pressures to differentiate, have IEP goals to meet, need to get Ss to collaborate, need to integrate tech, etc., all these “new” (or not so new) demands feel like “one more thing” when placed on the base of traditional “schooling”.

    I’ve taken some chances to bend tradition and I don’t pretend to have all the answers, but I know for sure that I’ve seen enough success to make me want to keep changing. I know for sure I’m differentiating. I know for sure that all students can meet success in my classroom. I know for sure I’m seeing some really motivated learners that are excited about being at school. It does take some work to make a round peg (a new way of doing things) fit in a square hole (the traditional way we are still bound to curriculum and reporting) but it can be done… the two are certainly not mutually exclusive.

    (Noticing I’m using lots of “quotes”…. just because I’m trying not to get caught up in the semantics of things… not sure Im using the exact right words for what I’m trying to convey.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: